From values to climate action
Policies and contextual changes that reduce contextual barriers can motivate and enable individuals to act on their biospheric values.
From values to climate action Read More »
Policies and contextual changes that reduce contextual barriers can motivate and enable individuals to act on their biospheric values.
From values to climate action Read More »
In this perspective, we summarize recent research emphasizing the central and indispensable role of emotion in human thinking and judgment.
Leveraging emotion for sustainable action Read More »
Pro-environmental minorities can pave the way towards ‘tipping points’ and spontaneous social change.
Minority influence in climate change mitigation Read More »
Participants rated the financial motives to commute to work using public transport as less important after the incentive was removed, suggesting that financial incentives provide people with a temporary motive to engage in the desired behaviour, which may explain the short-term effectiveness of the incentive.
Mitigation solutions are often evaluated in terms of costs and greenhouse gas reduction potentials, missing out on the consideration of direct effects on human well-being. Here, we systematically assess the mitigation potential of demand-side options categorized into avoid, shift and improve, and their human well-being links.
Highly environmentally friendly energy sources were more acceptable and evaluated more positively, especially among people who strongly endorsed biospheric values.
Results showed that having full influence over decision making (e.g., citizen control) did not lead to higher public acceptability of the decision-making process, final decision and resulting project, compared to having shared influence (e.g., partnership).
Based on a vast body of interdisciplinary literature, four types of normative standards for effective public participation can be distilled, which I call the four Ds: dialogue, decision-making power, diversity, and deliberation.
The more strongly people endorsed biospheric values (i.e., caring about nature and the environment) and altruistic values (i.e., caring about others), the more negatively they evaluated gas extraction and the induced earthquakes.
Our results imply that policymakers can encourage people to both behave pro-environmentally and support environmental policy without concern that one might impede the other.